|
News & Notes March 2004Continued from page 1... PDA LINE ITEM FOR LOCAL SOIL AND WATER DISTRICT ASSISTANCE The PDA line item for conservation districts has historically provided funding for district managers, administrative assistance, agricultural conservation technicians/engineers, Ombudsman, Pennsylvania Environmental Agricultural Conservation Certification of Excellence (PEACCE), farmland preservation and leadership development. As previously mentioned, funding for 50% cost share for salaries and benefits for conservation district managers and the administrative assistance grant for each conservation district is critical to maintaining the core function of a conservation district. The PDA line item has been augmenting the DEP line items in the areas of cost share for district managers and administrative assistance. PACD is requesting continued augmentation of these areas from the Department of Agriculture as another important step in building a truer PDA/conservation district partnership. Agriculture Conservation Technician/Engineer Program (ACT) provides one-on-one technical assistance and guidance to farmers. These technicians and engineers provide services to farmers that help them comply with Pennsylvania's environmental regulations. Conservation districts work with farmers to achieve voluntary compliance with these regulations. PDA, in conjunction with the State Conservation Commission, developed the Ombudsman Program to provide specific assistance to agricultural producers and conservation district boards dealing with complex or potentially contentious situations. The program created an intermediary or ombudsman between agricultural producers, municipalities and special interest groups to resolve issues and protect agriculture's right-to farm. For two years, three conservation districts worked on a pilot program called the Pennsylvania Environmental Agricultural Conservation Certification of Excellence (PEACCE). The PEACCE program moved beyond the pilot phase in FY 02/03. Sufficient funds were not available to fund the program in FY 03/04, but PACD believes that the program should again be funded in FY 04/05. Pennsylvania currently preserves more farmland than any other state in the nation with its 53 approved county-based farmland preservation programs. Conservation district staff provides direct administrative support for the program in 27 counties. In 36 additional counties, district staff members provide support services such as conservation planning and annual farm inspections. Because of the increasing importance placed on preserving farmland as well as the increased paperwork required in administering this program, PACD encourages continuing financial support for this program and increasing the funding for districts directly administering the program and for the districts that provide indirect services. As conservation district programs grow, the challenge and responsibility of developing, planning and managing an effective, locally led natural resource program increases dramatically. The long-term success of a conservation district and its programs is dependent on having competent, well-trained directors and staff. District directors must develop and hone the skills necessary to envision, develop and oversee an effective natural resource program designed to meet the needs of the local community. It is critical that both district managers and directors receive formal ongoing training and leadership development. PDA has supported this program and the PACD requests that this support continue. Below is a summary of the requested PDA Funding for Conservation District
Programs:
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Pennsylvania's Nutrient Management Program is a very successful program that provides technical assistance through conservation districts and plan writers, grants to farmers, and responsible implementation and enforcement of the Commonwealth's Nutrient Management Law and associated regulations. In addition, new program enhancements are included in proposed revisions to the regulations that will require greater program oversight and support at the state and local level in the future. This program was established with a non-lapsing Nutrient Management Fund in the PDA budget through which monies are provided for the different components of the program. Adequate funding for this program is essential to the agricultural community and the public to ensure the viability and success of the program. To date, adequate program funding has been available through the use of annual appropriations to the Fund in conjunction with reserve monies in the Fund from appropriations made in the early years of the program. In the Governor's proposed 2004-05 budget, the $3.28 Million transfer to the Nutrient Management Fund will not be adequate to administer the expanded program called for in the revisions to the regulations. An additional $400,000 (a total amount of $3.68 Million) is needed in the Nutrient Management Fund in 2004-05 to maintain appropriate program administration. The program activities that are anticipated during 2004-05 are expected to deplete the Nutrient Management Fund by the end of the fiscal year. With the Fund depleted at the end of the 2004-05 fiscal year, approximately $6 Million (the total annual program amount) will need to budgeted for the Fund for the 2005-06 fiscal year. Transfer to Nutrient Management Fund Needed for 2004-05 $3,680,000 Amount in Governor's 2004-05 Budget for Transfer to Fund Anticipated Transfer to Nutrient Management Fund Needed for 2005-06 $6,000,000 DIRT AND GRAVEL ROADS PROGRAM The law created a dedicated, non-lapsing fund to provide money (currently
$4 million per year) and training to local communities for local
road maintenance, specifically to halt and prevent pollution of water
and air. The State Conservation Commission annually allocates these
funds to 65 county conservation districts in Pennsylvania (out of 67
counties) that administer the Dirt & Gravel Road Program. At the current level of funding of $4 million per year, it will
take about 46 years to address the identified problem sites.
If DGRP funding is doubled to $8 million per year, the completion
cycle is reduced to 23 years to finish all known problem sites.
If DGRP funding is tripled to $12 million, the completion cycle
is reduced to about 15 years to finish all known problem sites. |
| About PACD | Conservation Districts | News | Events | Products & Services | Resources | Employment |
© 2003 Pennsylvania Association of Conservation Districts, Inc.